Explain a relevant ethical theory on gun control

On the opposing side, many gun control proponents advocate complete civilian disarmament. The scope of teaching and learning opportunities offered by the debate is suggested in Table 1. Reason might be of service in giving us the relevant data, but, in Hume's words, "reason is, and ought to be, the slave of the Explain a relevant ethical theory on gun control.

Gun Control and Social Contract Theory, Part 1

The following principles are the ones most commonly appealed to in applied ethical discussions: Some are only issues of social policy. Opponents of more gun control argue that there are already some 20, gun laws in the United States, and that, as more laws pass, more gun violence occurs.

Overview of the Gun Control Debate

Gun control would destroy this time-honored tradition. Finally, the use of rights language encourages people to make impractical demands, since one can assert a right without attending to the desirability or even the possibility of burdening others with the corresponding obligations.

Therefore, for selfish reasons alone, we devise a means of enforcing these rules: In this case, my duty of nonmaleficence emerges as my actual duty and I should not return the gun. Particularly when addressing complex social problems like gun violence, laws that use resources effectively and produce results without either abridging constitutional rights or having unexpected and undesirable consequences, are hard to craft.

Negative rights can be respected simply by each person refraining from interfering with each other, while it may be difficult or even impossible to fulfill everyone's positive rights if the sum of people's claims outstrips the resources available. Consequentialist Theories It is common for us to determine our moral responsibility by weighing the consequences of our actions.

The instrumental approach starts with the desired consequences like maximum utility and works backward to see which rights-ascriptions will produce those consequences. The reasons that rights provide are particularly powerful or weighty reasons, which override reasons of other sorts.

Other claim-rights entitle their holders to be free from undesirable conditions like hunger or fear. But agreeing on the goal of reducing gun violence is much less difficult than agreeing on the best way to reach that goal.

For example, it is wrong to not care for our children even if it results in some great benefit, such as financial savings. Sumner28 This normative ability confers freedom in a different sense. In recent years, the Columbine High School massacre, the shootings at Virginia Tech and other subsequent school shootings have pushed the gun control debate further into the public eye.


While it is difficult to deny the existence of thoseguns, it is worthwhile to examine how and why they came into the possession of their owners, and what factors influence their use.

Applied Ethics Applied ethics is the branch of ethics which consists of the analysis of specific, controversial moral issues such as abortion, animal rights, or euthanasia. The appeal of a point-counterpoint method of engaging students in learning models the real-life process of public policy making.

Two issues, though, are prominent: Through history many have asserted, for example, that God has the right to command man; yet presumably no one asserting such a right would maintain that society ought to defend God in the possession of anything. The following overview of the policy debate on gun violence, and the accompanying classroom strategy, suggest an alternative model for public policy formulation.

He was a spreadsheet user, and my tool of choice was the database. One right strongly supports another when it is logically or practically inconsistent to endorse the implementation of second right without endorsing the simultaneous implementation of the first.

Moreover, the point is often made that the moral urgency of securing positive rights may be just as great as the moral urgency of securing negative rights Shue Because society has accepted guns as a part of its social identity for so long, it is likely that members of legislative groups would themselves relate their own identities to gun ownership which may create a homogeneity of social ideologies within the group, therefore increasing the possibility that group Social Psychology in the Gun Control Debate 9 members may not be swayed easily if asked to create new or reform existing gun policies.

One could argue that understanding how to maintain a just and peaceful social order is the primary goal of the social studies curriculum.

Reducing violence is integral to the success of our democratic, participatory social system. However, when it comes to the enforcement of rights, this difference disappears. He argues that a guaranteed right to bear arms under any circumstances, including those that might endanger public safety, would provide grounds for repeal of the amendment rather than a case for respecting it.

Barnes, Outlines of Scepticism Cambridge: The statistics cited above, for example, do not show what happens when an area changes from one in which private citizens have guns to one in which they do not; at most they show what happens when cooperative people surrender their guns but determined criminals keep theirs.

Issues of Public Policy. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition. Or is it too broad to be enforceable. What Distinguishes Bearers of Rights. They might, for example, argue that convicted criminals have forfeited their right to the possession of a gun.

But issues related to violence underscore form with function. Handguns and rifles each account for slightly over a third of the total, with shotguns slightly under a third.

Gun Control: The Debate and Public Policy

Student Study Guide for Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, Application 3. A theory can try to explain crime for a large social unit or area (macro), or it can beyond an individual’s control.

General Deterrence. The firearms debate usually revolves around "gun control" -- that is, laws that would make guns harder to buy, carry, or own. But this is not the only way of reducing gun violence. It is possible. Gun Control: The Debate and Public Policy by Christine Watkins Violence is frequently the lead story on the evening news.

Crime and its prevention often figure prominently in. Learn exam 3 christian ethics with free interactive flashcards.

Choose from different sets of exam 3 christian ethics flashcards on Quizlet. The biggest "gun" in the anti-gun control lobby is the claim that having (and perhaps carrying) a gun prevents crime.

As I noted earlier, this is a sensible armchair claim. Someone contemplating a robbery is more likely to proceed if they think they can succeed with little risk to themselves.

Gun Control: The Debate and Public Policy

Social Psychology in the Gun Control Debate 1 Theories of Social Psychology in the Gun Control Debate Arron Quentin Umberger Bluefield State College Social Psychology in the Gun Control Debate 2 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to offer a social psychological analysis of .

Explain a relevant ethical theory on gun control
Rated 4/5 based on 96 review
Jonathan Wallace on the Ethics of Gun Control